The Bias in Cunliffe ‘Independent’ Review of Water Sector & lack of evidence
The Cunliffe Commission was supposed to be a once-in-a-lifetime root and branch review of the water sector; a reset to put the
About Martin Robertshaw
This author has not yet filled in any details.So far Martin Robertshaw has created 53 blog entries.
The Water Company Rich List
Published by the Sewage Campaign Network The Water Company Rich List 2025 "These figures are taken from annual reports published on
Campaign Honoured in King’s Birthday Honours
Ilkley Clean River Press Release, 23rd June 2025 Ilkley Clean River Group proudly announces that their chair, Professor Becky Malby, has been
Yorkshire Water CEO and DoF both banned from bonus
The banned bonuses for Yorkshire Water CEO and Director of Finance signals a headache for the executives overseeing shocking performance, under delivery,
Gov Interim report on Water Sector – more bureaucracy little action and a warm up to more failed privatisation
The Government's Independent Commission on Water has been billed as a once in a lifetime review of the water sector. Its interim
Busting the Myth of the ‘Independent’ Water Commission
Windrush Against Sewage Pollution (WASP) with our support has written to Sir Jon Cunliffe to ask him "to express no confidence in
EA spends £5.9M on criminal investigation of Water Companies to date
National Requests <national.requests@environment-agency.gov.uk> 22 March 2025 at 14:05 To: "ilkeycleanriver@gmail.com" <ilkeycleanriver@gmail.com> Good afternoon, RE: Request for information under the Freedom of Information Act
NAO report says investors have not invested – we know!
The National Audit Office reports today that Defra and the regulators have failed to drive enough investment in the past and now
Yorkshire Water’s Finances Exposed. There was no investment.
In the wake of the National Audit Office report citing poor performance in the water industry, a failure to invest and incompetent
Our Letter to Minister Hardy on Special Administration
Our Response Dear Minister Hardy, Thank you for your response of the 25th February. However, we are concerned that you have not directly addressed